Private Equity (PE)-Owned U.S. Insurers’ Investments Decrease as of Year-End
2021; Number of PE-Owned U.S. Insurers Increases

Link: https://content.naic.org/sites/default/files/capital-markets-special-reports-PE-owned-YE2021.pdf

Graphic:

Excerpt:

The BACV of total cash and invested assets for PE-owned insurers was about 6% of the U.S. insurance
industry’s $8.0 trillion at year-end 2021, down slightly from 6.5% of total cash and invested assets at
year-end 2020. The number of PE-owned insurers, however, increased to 132 in 2021 from 117 in 2020,
but they were about 3% of the total number of legal entity insurers at both year-end 2021 and year-end 2020.

Consistent with prior years, U.S. insurers have been identified as PE-owned via a manual process.
That is, the NAIC Capital Markets Bureau identifies PE-owned insurers to be those who reported any
percentage of ownership by a PE firm in Schedule Y, and other means of identification such as using
third-party sources, including directly from state regulators. As such, the number of U.S. insurers that
are PE-owned continues to evolve.1
Life companies continue to account for a significant proportion of PE-owned insurer investments at
year-end 2021, at 95% of total cash and invested assets (see Table 1). This represents a small decrease
from 97% at year-end 2020 (see Table 2). Notwithstanding, there was a slight increase in PE-owned
insurer investments for property/casualty (P/C) companies, to 4% at year-end 2021, compared to 3% the
prior year. In addition, there was also a small increase in total BACV for PE-owned title and health
companies’ investments, at about $1.1 billion at year-end 2021, compared to under $1 billion at yearend 2020.

Author(s): Jennifer Johnson and Jean-Baptiste Carelus

Publication Date: 19 Sept 2022

Publication Site: NAIC Special Capital Markets Reports

Practical Application of “Do Jumps Matter in the Long Term? A Tale of Two Horizons”

Link:https://www.soa.org/globalassets/assets/files/resources/naaj-practical-application-essays/2021/naaj-essay-cantor.pdf

Graphic:

Excerpt:

In this essay, we consider an additional application. Using the utility framework described by Warren (2019), we
examine the impact of using one of BB’s fitted jump-diffusion models on a pension plan sponsor’s long-term asset
allocation decision. We want to compare asset allocation results to those using the standard finance workhorse
model of a geometric Brownian motion (i.e., lognormal return generating process or LN hereafter).

Author(s):

Jean-François Bégin, PhD, FSA, FCIA
Mathieu Boudreault, PhD, FSA, FCIA
David R. Cantor, CFA, FRM, ASA
Kailan Shang, FSA, ACIA, CFA, PRM

Publication Date: September 2021

Publication Site: Society of Actuaries